A law firm representing the owners of an asset destroyed by non-state actors in the Red Sea needed to understand the case behind the loss: the nature, duration, and value of the external support flowing to the actor responsible, and how that picture might shape the legal options open to its clients.
We supported the legal team with investigative due diligence on the external sources of support sustaining the actor, and helped counsel game out potential legal strategies. We drew on experts with first-hand knowledge of the incident and of the location in which the loss occurred, with a view to estimating both current and potential contingent damages.
We mobilized industry experts in the relevant jurisdiction, sanctions specialists, and recently retired senior government officials with direct knowledge of the case — working alongside counsel, with our agentic platform integrating their inputs into material the legal team could build on. Sensitive work of this kind is handled discreetly and with appropriate regard for the constraints of active litigation.
Counsel went in with a sharper evidentiary picture and a structured view of options and exposure — built on regional access that conventional research and expert-network firms could not have reached.